![]() ![]() A higher bit rate MP3 will give you a better quality audio file, and a larger file size, but it can still never touch the quality of the original recording. A decent-quality, 256kbps MP3 of the same song is around 5MB - that's a massive amount of data lost in the compression process. A typical song as it is on a CD takes about 50MB of memory. What lossless audio compression does is retain every single bit of detail from the original recording, while still managing to reduce file sizes considerably. ![]() This is where the term 'bit rate' comes into play - the lower the bit rate, the more data that's been thrown away and, therefore, the lower the audio quality. The problem with this form of 'lossy' compression is that many people can perceive the bits of audio discarded and are left with the feeling that they're listening to lower quality music. Should I consider using it?Ī process is used when music is compressed into MP3 to discard all the sounds a machine thinks the human ear can't audibly perceive, thus vastly reducing the amount of storage needed to hold entire albums. I've heard that using lossless audio compression gives hugely improved sound quality over MP3.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |